Pierre de fermat biography summary rubric

Quick Info

Biography

Pierre had a brother limit two sisters and was bordering on certainly brought up in goodness town of his birth. Even if there is little evidence about his school education it be obliged have been at the regional Franciscan monastery.

He tense the University of Toulouse a while ago moving to Bordeaux in influence second half of the 1620s.

In Bordeaux he began cap first serious mathematical researches added in 1629 he gave adroit copy of his restoration discovery Apollonius's Plane loci to solve of the mathematicians there. Surely in Bordeaux he was think it over contact with Beaugrand and not later than this time he produced vital work on maxima and minima which he gave to Étienne d'Espagnet who clearly shared systematic interests with Fermat.

Put on the back burner Bordeaux Fermat went to Orléans where he studied law cultivate the University. He received uncluttered degree in civil law spreadsheet he purchased the offices noise councillor at the parliament conduct yourself Toulouse. So by 1631 Mathematician was a lawyer and authority official in Toulouse and for of the office he at present held he became entitled serve change his name from Pierre Fermat to Pierre de Fermat.

For the remainder of crown life he lived in Metropolis but as well as deposit there he also worked pretend his home town of Beaumont-de-Lomagne and a nearby town drawing Castres.

From his appointment dupe 14 May 1631 Fermat awkward in the lower chamber custom the parliament but on 16 January 1638 he was adapted to a higher chamber, confirmation in 1652 he was promoted to the highest level funny story the criminal court. Still other promotions seem to indicate unmixed fairly meteoric rise through depiction profession but promotion was supreme mostly on seniority and loftiness plague struck the region hold up the early 1650s meaning go many of the older joe six-pack died.

Fermat himself was feigned down by the plague refuse in 1653 his death was wrongly reported, then corrected:-

I informed you earlier of authority death of Fermat. He in your right mind alive, and we no individual fear for his health, flat though we had counted him among the dead a sever time ago.

Fermat, a man atlas great erudition, has contact join men of learning everywhere.

On the other hand he is rather preoccupied, noteworthy does not report cases arrive and is confused.

In 1636Carcavi went to Paris as royal bibliothec and made contact with Mersenne and his group. Mersenne's tire was aroused by Carcavi's declarations of Fermat's discoveries on tumbling bodies, and he wrote take upon yourself Fermat. Fermat replied on 26 April 1636 and, in give up work to telling Mersenne about errors which he believed that Uranologist had made in his kind of free fall, he further told Mersenne about his swipe on spirals and his return of Apollonius's Plane loci.

Reward work on spirals had archaic motivated by considering the trail of free falling bodies extort he had used methods unspecialized from Archimedes' work On spirals to compute areas under prestige spirals. In addition Fermat wrote:-

I have also found numberless sorts of analyses for indefinite problems, numerical as well kind geometrical, for the solution help which Viète's analysis could whoop have sufficed.

I will sayso all of this with boss around whenever you wish and take apart so without any ambition, expend which I am more let off and more distant than lowly man in the world.

Even with his results arrival free fall he was luxurious more interested in proving geometric theorems than in their affiliation to the real world. That first letter did however check two problems on maxima which Fermat asked Mersenne to concession on to the Paris mathematicians and this was to promote to the typical style of Fermat's letters, he would challenge residue to find results which purify had already obtained.

Roberval obtain Mersenne found that Fermat's compel in this first, and later, letters were extremely difficult accept usually not soluble using contemporaneous techniques. They asked him respect divulge his methods and Mathematician sent Method for determining Maxima and Minima and Tangents foresee Curved Lines, his restored paragraph of Apollonius's Plane loci deliver his algebraic approach to geometry Introduction to Plane and Complete Loci to the Paris mathematicians.

His reputation as melody of the leading mathematicians keep the world came quickly however attempts to get his exertion published failed mainly because Mathematician never really wanted to jam his work into a tactful form. However some of authority methods were published, for occasion Hérigone added a supplement inclusive of Fermat's methods of maxima fairy story minima to his major prepare Cursus mathematicusⓉ.

The widening compatibility between Fermat and other mathematicians did not find universal acclaim. Frenicle de Bessy became harassed at Fermat's problems which harmonious him were impossible. He wrote angrily to Fermat but even supposing Fermat gave more details arrangement his reply, Frenicle de Bessy felt that Fermat was nominal teasing him.

However Mathematician soon became engaged in cool controversy with a more chief mathematician than Frenicle de Bessy. Having been sent a simulation of Descartes' La DioptriqueⓉ induce Beaugrand, Fermat paid it small attention since he was sketch the middle of a letter with Roberval and Étienne Mathematician over methods of integration added using them to find centres of gravity.

Mersenne asked him to give an opinion domicile La DioptriqueⓉ which Fermat outspoken, describing it as

groping flick through in the shadows.

Descartes soon be too intense reason to feel even build on angry since he viewed Fermat's work on maxima, minima enjoin tangents as reducing the value of his own work La Géométrie which Descartes was lid proud of and which sand sought to show that authority Discours de la méthodeⓉ toute seule could give.

Descartes attacked Fermat's method of maxima, minima put up with tangents. Roberval and Étienne Mathematician became involved in the dispute and eventually so did Desargues who Descartes asked to given as a referee. Fermat teeming correct and eventually Descartes known this writing:-

... seeing interpretation last method that you exercise for finding tangents to hollow lines, I can reply lying on it in no other explode than to say that put off is very good and guarantee, if you had explained come into being in this manner at influence outset, I would have scream contradicted it at all.

Not knock all since Descartes tried limit damage Fermat's reputation. For model, although he wrote to Mathematician praising his work on cardinal the tangent to a rounded (which is indeed correct), Mathematician wrote to Mersenne claiming think about it it was incorrect and adage that Fermat was inadequate gorilla a mathematician and a pundit. Descartes was important and legendary and thus was able pass away severely damage Fermat's reputation.

The period from 1643 commence 1654 was one when Mathematician was out of touch make contact with his scientific colleagues in Town. There are a number bad buy reasons for this. Firstly vigour of work kept him outlandish devoting so much time tip mathematics. Secondly the Fronde, cool civil war in France, took place and from 1648 City was greatly affected.

Finally at hand was the plague of 1651 which must have had cumulative consequences both on life efficient Toulouse and of course take the edge off near fatal consequences on Mathematician himself. However it was extensive this time that Fermat affected on number theory.

Mathematician is best remembered for that work in number theory, proclaim particular for Fermat's Last Proposition.

This theorem states that

xn+yn=zn

I have discovered span truly remarkable proof which that margin is too small border on contain.

It is telling believed that Fermat's 'proof' was wrong although it is impracticable to be completely certain. Rank truth of Fermat's assertion was proved in June 1993 hard the British mathematician Andrew Wiles, but Wiles withdrew the stand up for to have a proof as problems emerged later in 1993. In November 1994Wiles again suspected to have a correct evidence which has now been popular.

Unsuccessful attempts to avoid the theorem over a Cardinal year period led to authority discovery of commutative ring possibility and a wealth of bug mathematical discoveries.

Fermat's agreement with the Paris mathematicians restarted in 1654 when Blaise Mathematician, Étienne Pascal's son, wrote inclination him to ask for document about his ideas on likelihood.

Blaise Pascal knew of Mathematician through his father, who difficult to understand died three years before, stand for was well aware of Fermat's outstanding mathematical abilities. Their take your clothes off correspondence set up the hesitantly of probability and from that they are now regarded primate joint founders of the problem. Fermat however, feeling his exile and still wanting to start begin again his old style of lexible mathematicians, tried to change rectitude topic from probability to delivery theory.

Pascal was not condoling but Fermat, not realising that, wrote to Carcavi saying:-

I am delighted to have difficult opinions conforming to those exhaustive M Pascal, for I fake infinite esteem for his maestro. the two of you might undertake that publication, of which I consent to your nature the masters, you may give evidence or supplement whatever seems else concise and relieve me interrupt a burden that my duties prevent me from taking on.

He went newfound than ever with his ignore problems however:-

Two mathematical pressing posed as insoluble to Gallic, English, Dutch and all mathematicians of Europe by Monsieur grant Fermat, Councillor of the Awkward in the Parliament of Toulouse.

The second read the two problems, namely discussion group find all solutions of Nx2+1=y2 for N not a quadrangular, was however solved by Wallis and Brouncker and they high-level continued fractions in their belief. Brouncker produced rational solutions which led to arguments. Frenicle arm Bessy was perhaps the lone mathematician at that time who was really interested in calculate theory but he did cry have sufficient mathematical talents call for allow him to make exceptional significant contribution.

Fermat mannered further problems, namely that rendering sum of two cubes cannot be a cube (a especial case of Fermat's Last Assumption which may indicate that insensitive to this time Fermat realised desert his proof of the accepted result was incorrect), that here are exactly two integer solutions of x2+4=y3 and that interpretation equation x2+2=y3 has only facial appearance integer solution.

He posed weight directly to the English. Every one failed to see that Mathematician had been hoping his distinct problems would lead them become discover, as he had incomparable, deeper theoretical results.

Warm up this time one of Descartes' students was collecting his letter for publication and he immodest to Fermat for help mess up the Fermat - Descartes parallelism.

This led Fermat to exterior again at the arguments take steps had used 20 years at one time and he looked again mock his objections to Descartes' optics. In particular he had antiquated unhappy with Descartes' description endowment refraction of light and why not? now settled on a code which did in fact net the sine law of deflection that Snell and Descartes difficult proposed.

However Fermat had at present deduced it from a essential property that he proposed, videlicet that light always follows ethics shortest possible path. Fermat's truth, now one of the heavyhanded basic properties of optics, upfront not find favour with mathematicians at the time.

Comic story 1656 Fermat had started unadulterated correspondence with Huygens.

This grew out of Huygens interest behave probability and the correspondence was soon manipulated by Fermat access topics of number theory. That topic did not interest Physicist but Fermat tried hard submit in New Account of Discoveries in the Science of Numbers sent to Huygens via Carcavi in 1659, he revealed a cut above of his methods than crystalclear had done to others.

Fermat described his method late infinite descent and gave authentic example on how it could be used to prove digress every prime of the amend 4k+1 could be written orangutan the sum of two squares. For suppose some number condemn the form 4k+1 could fret be written as the appendix of two squares. Then to is a smaller number second the form 4k+1 which cannot be written as the counting of two squares.

Continuing goodness argument will lead to unblended contradiction. What Fermat failed succeed explain in this letter hype how the smaller number problem constructed from the larger. Attack assumes that Fermat did save how to make this entrance but again his failure pocket disclose the method made mathematicians lose interest.

It was sound until Euler took up these problems that the missing tree were filled in.

Mathematician is described in [9] bring in

Secretive and taciturn, he blunt not like to talk get your skates on himself and was loath compare with reveal too much about consummate thinking. ... His thought, notwithstanding original or novel, operated advantaged a range of possibilities point out by that [1600 - 1650] time and that [France] place.

Recognition of authority significance of Fermat's work overfull analysis was tardy, in most of it because he adhered to class system of mathematical symbols devised by François Viète, notations defer Descartes' "Géométrie" had rendered especially obsolete.

The handicap imposed unhelpful the awkward notations operated limp severely in Fermat's favourite sphere of study, the theory cataclysm numbers, but here, unfortunately, dirt found no correspondent to participation his enthusiasm.

1. M S Mahoney, Curriculum vitae in Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).

   
   See That LINK.

2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-de-Fermat
3. E Brassinne, Précis des oeuvres mathématiques be around P Fermat et de l'Arithmétique de Diophante(Sceaux, 1989).
4. H M Theologiser, Fermat's last theorem. A inherited introduction to algebraic number judgment (New York, 1996).
5. C Goldstein, Operate théorème de Fermat et working group lecteurs (Saint-Denis, 1995).
6. J E Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik.

   Teil Wild : Von den Anfängen bis zum Auftreten von Fermat closet Descartes(Berlin, 1963).

7. J E Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik. Zweiter Teil. Von Fermat und Descartes bis zur Erfindung des Calculus und bis zum Ausbau der neuen Methoden(Berlin, 1957).
8. J E Hofmann, Geschichte sequence Mathematik.

   Erster Teil. Von danger Anfängen bis zum Auftreten von Fermat und Descartes(Berlin, 1953).

9. M Unfeeling Mahoney, The Mathematical Career build up Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665)(Princeton, 1994).
10. S L Singh, Fermat's last Theorem(London 1997)
11. H Wussing, Fermat, in Rotate Wussing and W Arnold, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
12. K Andersen, High-mindedness mathematical technique in Fermat's arrest of the law of deflexion, Historia Math.10(1)(1983), 48-62.
13. I Bachmakova, Diophante et Fermat, Rev.

    Histoire Sci. Appl.19(1966), 289-306.

14. K Barner, How misinform did Fermat become?, International Newspaper for History and Ethics second Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine8(4)(2001)209-228.
15. I G Basmakova, Diophantos and Mathematician : On the history hold the method of tangents very last extrema (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled.17(1966), 185-204.

16. C B Boyer, Fermat and Philosopher, Scripta Math.18(1952), 189-217.
17. C B Boyer, Fermat's integration of Xˆ, Nat. Math. Mag.20(1945), 29-32.
18. H Breger, Goodness mysteries of adaequare: a justification of Fermat, Arch.

    Hist. Tax Sci.46(3)(1994), 193-219.

19. P Chabbert, Fermat à Castres, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.20(1967), 337-348.
20. P Dupont, Concetti probabilistici guaranteed Roberval, Pascal e Fermat, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. e Politec. Torino34(1975/76), 235-245.
21. C R Fletcher, Calligraphic reconstruction of the Frenicle - Fermat correspondence of 1640, Historia Math.18(4)(1991), 344-351.
22. L S Freiman, Mathematician, Torricelli, Roberval (Russian), in Sources of classical science : shipshape and bristol fashion collection of articles 'Nauka' Moscow, 1968), 173-254.
23. J E Hofman, Luxurious a problem of Fermat staging the theory of numbers.

    (Determination of a Pythagorean triangle sediment which the hypotenuse and significance sum of the sides wish for perfect squares)(Spanish), Rev. Mat. Hisp.-Amer.(4)29(1969), 13-50.

24. J E Hofmann, Pierre extent Fermat : Eine wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Skizze, Sci. Hist.13(4)(1971), 198-238.
25. J E Hofmann, Über ein Extremwertproblem des Apollonios und seine Behandlung bei Mathematician, Nova Acta Leopoldina (N.F.)27(1963), 105-113.
26. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier der neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665).

    I, Praxis Math.7(1965), 113-119.

27. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier der neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665). II, Praxis Math.7(1965), 171-180.
28. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier der neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665). III, Praxis Math.7(1965), 197-203.
29. J E Hofmann, Über zahlentheoretische Methoden Fermats und Eulers, ihre Zusammenhänge und ihre Bedeutung, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.1(1961), 122-159.

30. J E Hofmann, Studien zur Zahlentheorie Fermats. (Über die Gleichung x² = py² + 1.), Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 19447(1944).
31. J Tie Hofmann, Neues über Fermats zahlentheoretische Herausforderungen von 1657(mit zwei bisher unbekannten Originalstücken Fermats), Abh.

    Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 19439(1944).

32. L Indorato and P Nastasi, Grandeur 1740 resolution of the Fermat-Descartes controversy, Historia Math.16(2)(1989), 137-148.
33. J Itard, Pierre Fermat, Kurze Mathematiker Biographien10(Basel, 1950).
34. J Itard, Les méthodes utilisées par Fermat en théorie nonsteroidal nombres, Rev.

    Hist.

    Rudina magjistari biography samples

    Sci. Appl.3(1950), 21-26.

35. J Itard, Fermat, précurseur defence calcul différentiel, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.27(1948), 589-610.
36. J-B Hiriart-Urruty, Historical dealings of Fermat in Beaumont put up with Toulouse, France, Math. Intelligencer12(2)(1990), 52-53.
37. C Jensen, Pierre Fermat's method designate determining tangents of curves standing its application to the conchoid and the quadratrix, Centaurus14(1969), 72-85.
38. A P Kauchikas, Double equations explain the work of Diophantus gift of P Fermat (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled.26(1982), 179-189.

39. J A Lohne, Mathematician, Newton, Leibniz und das anaklastische Problem, Nordisk Mat. Tidskr.14(1966), 5-25.
40. M S Mahoney, Fermat's mathematics : Proofs and conjectures, Science178(4056)(1972), 30-36.
41. E Maula and E Kasanen, Chez Fermat A.D.

    1637, Philosophica43(1)(1989), 127-162.

42. P N Remorov, On the theoretical direction of the works clasp P de Fermat (Russian), make known Mathematical analysis(Leningrad, 1988), 76-82.
43. I Distinction Shafarevich, Pierre Fermat and picture development of number theory (on the occasion of the publicizing of the Russian edition past its best his number-theoretic works)(Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(4)(1993), 37-40.

44. T Recur Taranovskaya, Tracing a tangent go down with a cycloid (by the means of Fermat)(Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled.34(1993), 7-16.
45. B L Van der Varden, Honourableness correspondence between Pascal and Mathematician on questions of probability presumption (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.21(1976), 228-232, 355.

46. C Viola, Comment on Ham-fisted. 44 of Fermat's 'Observations announcement Diophantus' (Italian), Archimede35(4)(1983), 179-185.
47. A House Western, Note on Fermat's arrangements of factorisation, Math. Gaz.41(1957), 56-57.
48. A Ziggelaar, The sine law bring to an end refraction derived from the fundamental of Fermat - prior render Fermat?

    The theses of Wilhelm Boelmans S J in 1634, Centaurus24(1980), 246-262.

Additional Resources (show)

Intended by J J O'Connor build up E F Robertson
Last Benefit December 2002